Reflections on Practical Challenges and Countermeasures for Activation and Utilization of Historical and Cultural Heritage in the Process of Integrated Urban-rural Planning

Authors

  • Luyu Cai Ritsumeikan University, Beijing 102445, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/a0aay951

Keywords:

City and countryside integration; Historical and cultural heritage; Activation and utilization; Town and country planning; Cultural inheritance.

Abstract

In the context of the integrated and improved development of urban and rural areas, the phenomenon of similar urban and rural spatial styles has become increasingly prominent. Exploring and making effective use of local historical and cultural resources is an important way to maintain regional cultural characteristics and continue local cultural traditions. It has a practical effect on improving the quality of urban and rural spaces and promoting balanced regional development. From the perspective of grassroots construction, at present, the connection between cultural heritage protection and development is not tight enough. The development degree of existing cultural resources is shallow and the utilization forms are single, and a large amount of cultural value has not been fully released. Based on the concept of integrated urban and rural development, this article, combined with the actual construction scenarios, discusses various practical obstacles encountered in the implementation and connection of the urban and rural planning system and heritage protection standards. At present, there are still many practical problems in the process of heritage activation and implementation. Issues such as insufficient planning coordination, fixed development paths, limited participation channels for governance, and incomplete supporting mechanisms are particularly prominent. The continuous weakening of rural cultural ecology further leads to the idle and loss of local cultural resources, impacting the foundation of regional cultural inheritance. In response to these practical problems, the article builds an optimized system from five dimensions: planning control, characteristic development, diversified governance, institutional support, and cultural ecological protection, and explores the heritage activation paths suitable for the integrated urban and rural development scenarios. The research results can provide practical references for heritage protection work in urban and rural renewal, promoting the simultaneous improvement of regional cultural construction, economic development, and grassroots governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu, Y. S. (2018). Research on the urban rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4), 637 650.

[2] Li, B. H., Yi, Y., & Dou, Y. D. (2023). Spatial fragmentation and integrated planning optimization of urban and rural cultural heritage resources. Human Geography, 38(6), 115 124.

[3] Uribe Chinen, C. (2024). Talent construction and operational innovation for sustainable cultural heritage development in urban rural integrated regions. International Journal of Cultural Property, 31(4), 411 434.

[4] Arthur, I. K. (2025). Examining stakeholders’ perspectives on strategies for revitalising old and historic buildings in the Sekondi Takoradi Metropolitan Area, Ghana. International Development Planning Review, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2025.11

[5] Wu, J. Y. (2025). From landscape gene identification to adaptive restoration: An analysis of the pathways for the protection and activation of traditional village landscapes. Landscape Architecture, 21(5), 1 15. https://doi.org/10.3724/j.fjyl.LA20250215

[6] Wei, C. (2026). Protection and revitalization of traditional villages in the new era: Institutional innovation, governance collaboration, and technological empowerment. Journal of Natural Resources, 41(4), 963 992. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20260401

[7] Han, W. (2026). The restructuring mechanisms and models of traditional villages in the metropolitan fringes: Based on inter subject power interactions. Journal of Natural Resources, 41(6), 1736 1753. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20260606

[8] Feng, W. H., & Meng, Y. (2025). Research on the construction and sustainable development of cave dwellings in Mogou Village, Mengzhou City. Buildings, 15(9), 1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091460

[9] Cui, L. P., Zhao, Y. Q., Li, D. B., et al. (2022). A typological approach to the transformation of cave dwellings in Baishe Village, Shaanxi, China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(3), 1211 1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1998734

[10] Wang, X., Liu, H., & Zhang, M. (2024). Improvement of human comfort in rural cave dwellings via sunrooms in cold regions of China. Sustainability, 14(3), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14030734

Downloads

Published

24-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cai, L. (2026). Reflections on Practical Challenges and Countermeasures for Activation and Utilization of Historical and Cultural Heritage in the Process of Integrated Urban-rural Planning. Academic Journal of History and Culture, 1(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.54097/a0aay951